Fairly standard. First came a brief phone screen to assess back-ground and fit. Next came a few phone screens with the head of PM (my boss) and another TPM. Each were fairly standard and quick. Finally, I was invited on site to interview with 6 people over a 3-hour period. I thought the onsite went extremely well. I was prepared, confident and friendly and my skill-set and experience seemed to be a great fit. I left feeling pretty good about my chances to receive an offer. Upon return, I waited a full week and heard nothing. So I sent the recruiter an email thanking him and asking for the status. Nothing. I waited 4 more days and still nothing so I sent another quick email. Almost 2 weeks after the interview I received a short, form email telling me thanks, but no thanks. Something about "not the right fit" was given as a reason but nothing concrete. I asked the recruiter for some details so that I might use this experience as a learning tool. Again, no response. Am I the only one who thinks this is BS? I mean, I poured myself into this process and worked hard to prepare and put my best-self out there. The least they can do is give me some honest, useful feedback. I don't need to be coddled, just give it to me straight. Uber is not unique in this behavior. It seems pretty standard. But it leaves me with a bad taste on the process.

I was interviewed by an Engineering Manager who didn't seem to understand the practices and boundaries of a TPM role. This was a negative point that hindered the flow of the interview. The conversation was heavily biased towards engineering and less effective in terms of program management.