Had a Zoom Call with the Selection Committee and was selected to come to campus for a personal interview with the Committee and President. The interview with the committee was 1 hour. Not quite a fair selection process, although the questions from the committee were in-depth, just seemed as though they already had their mind made up. I'm not sure why I was invited out there. The VP biased the group by saying "you're not giving us any new ideas." The group concurred immediately, say8ing we're already doing those things. Seems the team is looking for a savior where all ideas come from one person (this individual). I brought up innovative ideas using AI, etc, and what some outstanding universities are doing in marketing. I did my homework, and pointed out they are not getting the 28-36 age group for grad studies, it's current 22-24, so you're not already doing many of the things I met. I feel as though they might have been asked to get three candidates, and this was gratuitous, at best. My recommendation is twofold: only bring a candidate you're serious about to campus; don't bias an interview if you're the hiring manager on a committee. Finally, seems the committee was looking for ways to justify their own lack of results by hiring someone who can do it all, graduate recruiting, multi-media, strategic marketing, business development, etc. Honestly, this job was a red flag based on lack of focus, just a catch all for everything the university is not doing.