Initial interview, followed by life story interview. I thought the pairing programming would be difficult. So spent some time reading the online review to understand what they look for. But the question was so simple. Even I spent quite a lot of time 'communicating' with the interviewer, I still completed it early. Then I asked a couple of times anything I missed or I could improve the solution before wrapping up the meeting. That was why I was so surprised to be turned down in this round. I won't be surprised if it happened in the first two rounds, as they were subjective. However, shouldn't the programing test be objective?

First round: Case study style SQL questions with python coding and short assessment like an IQ test Final round: marketplace case study, coding based analysis, life story, and in depth project