Ir al contenidoIr al pie de página
  • Empleos
  • Empresas
  • Sueldos
  • Para empleadores

      Impulsa tu carrera profesional

      Averigua cuánto podrías ganar, encuentra el empleo perfecto y comparte información sobre tu vida laboral y personal de forma anónima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Sennder

      Empleador activo

      Información
      Evaluaciones
      Pago y prestaciones
      Empleos
      Entrevistas
      Entrevistas
      Búsquedas relacionadas: Evaluaciones de Sennder | Empleos en Sennder | Sueldos en Sennder | Prestaciones en Sennder
      Entrevistas en SennderEntrevistas para el cargo de Senior Python Developer en SennderEntrevista en Sennder


      Glassdoor

      • Acerca de
      • Premios
      • Blog
      • Contacto

      Empleadores

      • Cuenta de empleador gratuita
      • Centro de empleador

      Información

      • Ayuda
      • Pautas
      • Condiciones de uso
      • Privacidad y opciones de anuncios
      • No vender ni compartir mi información
      • Herramienta de autorización de cookies

      Trabaja con nosotros

      • Anunciantes
      • Oportunidades laborales
      Descargar aplicación

      • Buscar por:
      • Empresas
      • Empleos
      • Ubicaciones

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor", "Worklife Pro", "Bowls" y sus logotipos son marcas comerciales registradas de Glassdoor LLC.

      Empresas seguidas

      Sigue a tus empresas favoritas para estar al tanto de las últimas oportunidades y disponer de información desde adentro.

      Búsquedas de empleo

      Recibe recomendaciones y actualizaciones personalizadas al iniciar tu búsqueda.

      Entrevista para Senior Python Developer

      27 abr 2021
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Sin ofertas
      Experiencia positiva
      Entrevista fácil

      Solicitud

      Me postulé a través de un reclutador. Acudí a una entrevista en Sennder

      Entrevista

      It has several levels. 1. Intro call with a recruiter The first round went fine. 2. Assessment round " they have shared a link in which I found GitHub link. I have downloaded and uploaded the working code back." 3. Technical interview "Engineering manager shared the link to download the code and asked to explain" 4. White Board interview 5. Final round In the second round, They allocated a task to complete. I have completed and submitted the working code though. But, I got an email stating" moving forward to the next candidate". I was very confident that I submitted the working code. So, I contacted the recruiter to look into it once again. later I have received an email stating "I have selected in the second round". In the third round, The technical person was talking nicely. however, he gave me a module to explain and write a similar kind of module. "As those libraries weren't installed in my system, I couldn't able to run the module and explain. EVENTHOUGH I HAVE GONE THROUGH LINE BY LINE to understand the objective(purpose) of the module WITHOUT RUNNING THE MODULE(code). Hence, It took a little time to comprehend the class. I gave correct answers to what the purpose of the module was. Later, he asked me " what do you think you need to change in the change". There is where I made a mistake Because the code was clean. There is no repetition in the code. But the function of the class had several lines instead of breaking function into small-small sub-functions to improve the efficiency of the system. I know these concepts but They didn't hit my mind instantly. He gave me the clue "OOPs concept". then I remembered and said " yes I suggested dividing the work into small-small sub-functions and I have shown the code of the second round to explain how I divided the functionality to improve the efficiency. I thought that I would get selected in the third round as I gave all the correct answers. I have not considered the timing because I have given the correct answers even without running the code. But we can't expect them to think in the same way. I have received stating "He felt that you weren't strong enough in regards to object-oriented programing and functional development, linter cases, and algorithms. Because of this, he felt it would be too difficult to get you up to speed in our environment."

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      Find the Minimum number of coins? explain the code (asteroid library has been used) "Json Response" & Rest API HTTP url
      Responder pregunta
      4
      avatar
      Respuesta de Sennder
      4y
      Thank you for your review and for taking the time to interview with us. Kind regards, Team sennder.