Ir al contenidoIr al pie de página
  • Empleos
  • Empresas
  • Sueldos
  • Para empleadores

      Impulsa tu carrera profesional

      Averigua cuánto podrías ganar, encuentra el empleo perfecto y comparte información sobre tu vida laboral y personal de forma anónima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Pocket Gems

      ¿Esta es tu empresa?

      Información
      Evaluaciones
      Pago y prestaciones
      Empleos
      Entrevistas
      Entrevistas
      Búsquedas relacionadas: Evaluaciones de Pocket Gems | Empleos en Pocket Gems | Sueldos en Pocket Gems | Prestaciones en Pocket Gems
      Entrevistas en Pocket GemsEntrevistas para el cargo de Senior Software Engineer en Pocket GemsEntrevista en Pocket Gems


      Glassdoor

      • Acerca de
      • Premios
      • Blog
      • Contacto

      Empleadores

      • Cuenta de empleador gratuita
      • Centro de empleador

      Información

      • Ayuda
      • Pautas
      • Condiciones de uso
      • Privacidad y opciones de anuncios
      • No vender ni compartir mi información
      • Herramienta de autorización de cookies

      Trabaja con nosotros

      • Anunciantes
      • Oportunidades laborales
      Descargar aplicación

      • Buscar por:
      • Empresas
      • Empleos
      • Ubicaciones

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor", "Worklife Pro", "Bowls" y sus logotipos son marcas comerciales registradas de Glassdoor LLC.

      Empresas seguidas

      Sigue a tus empresas favoritas para estar al tanto de las últimas oportunidades y disponer de información desde adentro.

      Búsquedas de empleo

      Recibe recomendaciones y actualizaciones personalizadas al iniciar tu búsqueda.

      Entrevista para Senior Software Engineer

      19 ene 2017
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Sin ofertas
      Experiencia negativa
      Entrevista fácil

      Solicitud

      Me postulé en línea. El proceso tomó 2 semanas. Acudí a una entrevista en Pocket Gems en dic 2016

      Entrevista

      Applied online, the whole process took about 2 weeks. Weird that i only get to talk to 1 person verbally throughout the entire process. Round 1. Online coding question. all of them are very easy, i mean shockingly easy for a senior position. Round 2. Email with HR, this is where i found weird since it's usually a 30 minute call to gather some information, but it's done via email. Round 3. onsite/remote onsite with an engineer. This is where things go super odd. I had 2 questions, one is to implement a strstr in Java without using indexOf, i described the naive way and the KMP, and i was told to just implement the naive way which i did, and got a slight mistake in the first go, and corrected myself, i did ask if it's the style or the speed that they were looking for, but the interviewer said just do which ever way i wanted. Second question was about implementing a feature that there is a bunch of items, each of them can be stacked together, and the maximum number of items in the stack is provided as parameter, and you can only stack the same items together. Each item is given a sale price. now implement a method given the item information, stacking information and number of stacks you can have in the inventory, find the most value you can fit in the inventory. I finished the question and got stopped halfway through writing tests, and the interviewer said i got it right, there's no need for more tests. which i took as a good sign considering it is quite a simple feature. The tail spin comes the next day, i got an email from the recruiter saying that they don't want to continue the interview process and there was no feedback provided. I was pretty shocked considering i've got full mark in the online test, and i was told by the interviewer that both of my interview questions were right during the interview. So i wrote back asking for reasons, and i got a email, generated from the system, saying that i have problem with my CS fundamental. This is clearly not the reason behind this, so i chased it up with the recruiter and ask for more specific feedback then no one ever respond again. Have to say, i should not be surprised about their lack of professionalism after reading the interview reviews from glassdoor, so if you are applying or thinking of applying for pocket gems, make sure you think twice and be prepared for rejections that may come from nowhere.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      Nothing special, all very very simple questions really.
      Responder pregunta
      2

      Otras evaluaciones sobre las entrevistas para el cargo de Senior Software Engineer en Pocket Gems

      Entrevista para Senior Software Engineer

      10 may 2018
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      San Francisco, CA
      Sin ofertas
      Experiencia negativa
      Entrevista promedio

      Solicitud

      Me postulé en línea. El proceso tomó 3 semanas. Acudí a una entrevista en Pocket Gems (San Francisco, CA) en abr 2018

      Entrevista

      Phone, then two onsites. I don't think you should apply. Either they're not hiring or their bar for hire is higher than their current engineering level - meaning their engineers wouldn't pass their own bar to begin with. I can tell by the questions they're asking me regarding the algorithm / solution. They said they all liked me, I answered every question with optimal solution, but still decided not to proceed because of communication issues. They also messed up one of the interviews (one of them was supposed to be non-technical, but all were technical) and it feels like they're using it against me.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      Phone round: clone graph Two onsites: 1. Achievement system (OO design) basically implement a system that awards players 2. Implement a Str class with Str* substr() that shares char* data with original Str object 3. Implement strstr() 4. Median of two sorted 5. Sort Colors 6. Return number of groups of words, where words are grouped: "dra" "gon" "dragon" -> 2 because {"dra", "dragon"} {"gon", "dragon"} "string" "trin" "ring" "ringo" "o" "z" -> 4 because {"o", "ringo"} {"ring" "ringo" "string"} {trin, string} {z}
      Responder pregunta
      4

      Entrevista para Senior Software Engineer

      18 feb 2012
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      San Francisco, CA
      Sin ofertas
      Experiencia neutra
      Entrevista difícil

      Solicitud

      El proceso tomó 1 día. Acudí a una entrevista en Pocket Gems (San Francisco, CA) en dic 2011

      Entrevista

      I spoke with an engineer at a campus career fair.

      Preguntas de entrevista [2]

      Pregunta 1

      Round a floating point number to the nearest integer. Do not use any helper functions.
      1 respuesta

      Pregunta 2

      What are some fundamental differences between Java & .NET?
      1 respuesta
      1