I recently went through the interview process at Ordinary Folks and would like to share my feedback about the experience. While there were positive aspects, there were also some areas that left me feeling disappointed, particularly regarding the excessive number of interview rounds. The initial stages of the interview process went smoothly. I had successful 3rd rounds interviews with different team members, which gave me a positive impression of the company. However, I found one particular design challenge to be extensive and time-consuming. It included tasks such as creating a mood board, a storyboard, social media post mockups, and developing marketing strategies. Although I was genuinely interested in the role, I just did it anyway as an unpaid test, which raised concerns about the fair treatment of candidates. After another interview for my presenting my design test, which was already 4th rounds, I received generally positive feedback, which boosted my confidence. However, there was a delay in the final round, and I received an automated rejection email before completing it. Despite seeking clarification, the miscommunication left me uncertain about the company's professionalism. When I finally had the chance to meet with a final team member, I felt that the meeting did not go as expected. The questions asked seemed unusual, and there was a lack of clarity regarding further steps in the hiring process or onboarding. This left me feeling confused about the purpose of the meeting. After the final meeting, there was a lack of communication from the company. Despite my attempts to follow up, I received no response. Eventually, I received a rejection email stating that another candidate had been selected for the role. In reflection, I believe that the interview process at Ordinary Folks could benefit from some improvements. The extensive design test, which was unpaid, raises questions about the company's respect for the value of a candidate's work. Additionally, the excessive number of interview rounds seemed unnecessary and did not contribute significantly to evaluating my fit for the role. Furthermore, the lack of clear communication and delays in the process could be addressed to provide a more positive candidate experience.