Me postulé en línea. Acudí a una entrevista en Nubank (São Paulo, )
Entrevista
Very long and tedious interview process. Lasted for several (4+) months with many interviews. If you ever say you're not in a hurry they will just drag you forever. Feedback was also very slow, taking over a month to respond regarding step results.
The final step is a flight to they HQ where you do a "pair programming" and maybe some more interviews. The "pair programming" was disastrous as it was expected I should follow their implicit development methodologies and questions weren't answered directly. An example question that I'd ask would be:
- Do you want me to write a better test for this function or should I move one to the next task?
And the answer would be:
- You can choose
The problem is that the choice will impact their final decision even though you just want clarification regarding what they want you to show them given the time constraint: a better unit test or more problem solving. You can't do both and if you pick the wrong one too many times they will decline you.
Preguntas de entrevista [1]
Pregunta 1
Modify of the project they initially sent to accommodate one out of two or three new features they are proposing (you can pick).
Codesignal round with some DSA / OOP is the first pre screening, Each question is in increasing difficulty, there are 4 questions. It is important to manage time as there is just 90 minutes to complete the task, ran out of time and was not able to even start the 4th problem.
Preguntas de entrevista [1]
Pregunta 1
Multi level OOP style coding question in increasing difficulty
Me postulé a través de un reclutador. Acudí a una entrevista en Nubank (São Paulo, ) en jun 2026
Entrevista
O processo foi tranquilo, as fasea até aqui foram:
Cod review, Eu e mais dois Devs.
Desafio de cod, pela plataforma CodeSignal.
Entrevista online
Provas online
e entrevista com RH
Me enviaram o link para um teste de código, o qual eu poderia desenvolver em qualquer linguagem. Acho o teste um pouco equivocado: porque ele determina que o seu código rode, e acho ok. Porém, não se pode consultar documentações de apis e nem usar ferramentas auxiliares, vc deve ficar com seu computador "travado" na tela do teste. Entendo que, hoje, com as ferramentas de IA auxiliares, isso não faz sentido: código virou commodity, e deveria ser cobradas questões realmente relevantes, questões conceituais, de arquitetura. E o pior foi uma instrução do teste que informava não ser necessária a codificação da melhor solução: o código deveria apenas passar pelos testes unitários, o que fez menos sentido aínda.
Preguntas de entrevista [1]
Pregunta 1
Codificação de uma classe para guardar receitas culinárias.