Ir al contenidoIr al pie de página
  • Empleos
  • Empresas
  • Sueldos
  • Para empleadores

      Impulsa tu carrera profesional

      Averigua cuánto podrías ganar, encuentra el empleo perfecto y comparte información sobre tu vida laboral y personal de forma anónima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Navan

      Empleador activo

      Información
      Evaluaciones
      Pago y prestaciones
      Empleos
      Entrevistas
      Entrevistas
      Búsquedas relacionadas: Evaluaciones de Navan | Empleos en Navan | Sueldos en Navan | Prestaciones en Navan
      Entrevistas en NavanEntrevistas para el cargo de People Analyst en NavanEntrevista en Navan


      Glassdoor

      • Acerca de
      • Premios
      • Blog
      • Contacto

      Empleadores

      • Cuenta de empleador gratuita
      • Centro de empleador

      Información

      • Ayuda
      • Pautas
      • Condiciones de uso
      • Privacidad y opciones de anuncios
      • No vender ni compartir mi información
      • Herramienta de autorización de cookies

      Trabaja con nosotros

      • Anunciantes
      • Oportunidades laborales
      Descargar aplicación

      • Buscar por:
      • Empresas
      • Empleos
      • Ubicaciones

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor", "Worklife Pro", "Bowls" y sus logotipos son marcas comerciales registradas de Glassdoor LLC.

      Empresas seguidas

      Sigue a tus empresas favoritas para estar al tanto de las últimas oportunidades y disponer de información desde adentro.

      Búsquedas de empleo

      Recibe recomendaciones y actualizaciones personalizadas al iniciar tu búsqueda.

      Entrevista para People Analyst

      23 may 2021
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Sin ofertas
      Experiencia negativa
      Entrevista fácil

      Solicitud

      Acudí a una entrevista en Navan

      Entrevista

      Phone Screen Hiring Manager Phone Screen Four hour take home analyst project panel interview to discuss project 2-3 additional 1:1's First off, company puts 'python, R, etc' in their job posting. When I speak with them I learn they are doing everything in google sheets/excel...all the while somehow having a costly snowflake setup...weird. It really irks me when companies throw a bunch of technology in their job postings that aren't even really part of their 'stack'...at least this department within the company. (people) After a moderately exhaustive interview process, the recruiter followed up with me on Monday after my final interview (Friday). She let me know that the initial feedback was great and she would be in touch by the end of the week. That date came and went (surprise?)...I followed up the following Monday, waited almost 48 hours before I received a response. The recruiter asked if I could have a call sometime the following morning... I promptly replied with an hour window. She never replied to my email and that time came and went, she calls me randomly out of the blue three hours later while I am dripping with sweat in my garden to let me know the 'bad news' (really great news) She gives me the following feedback : This job was originally posted remote or California (their home office) that a local candidate came along that 'made more sense'. This just also happened to coincide with this companies CEO forcing everyone back into the office in June according to what I have read on here. The other piece of feedback was that there was an 'error' in one of my data analysis slides. No proof of the error, nothing pointed out...just an 'error'. I'm sure that might have been true as I did this project around 2am because I have a busy life and companies asking me to do four hour unpaid projects isn't high on my priority list. Had I not been treated with ZERO respect, I wouldn't have even written this review. This is what you get when you treat people like dirt.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      Which source (e.g., Agency, LinkedIn, Jobs Site, Referral, etc) was the most efficient? Which was the least efficient? It’s up to you on how you define “efficient” and please explain your thought process in your response. Which source should we invest more in?
      Responder pregunta
      1