The conversations were interesting and the product seems promising, but the overall candidate experience was disappointing. The process included three interview steps, all with senior stakeholders, including a final conversation that took place quite late in the day and in suboptimal conditions, with connectivity issues and interruptions. Given the technical nature of the role, I was also surprised that there was no clear assessment of my technical skills, implementation approach, or ability to manage customer-facing technical delivery.
After being told that some internal calibration was still ongoing, the process ended with a generic rejection and no actionable feedback, despite the time invested.
For candidates reaching later stages, clearer communication, better interview conditions, a more structured technical evaluation, and more specific feedback would make the process feel more respectful and more aligned with the seniority of the role.
Acudí a una entrevista en Nanonets (Bangalore Rural)
Entrevista
The interview was highly interactive, combining a mix of insightful questions and practical exercises. This approach allowed for a dynamic exchange and provided a comprehensive assessment of my skills and abilities.
Preguntas de entrevista [1]
Pregunta 1
tell about a time you went above and beyond for the client
Me postulé en línea. El proceso tomó 1 semana. Acudí a una entrevista en Nanonets (Hyderabad)
Entrevista
- Very vague and irrelevant to the job description
- Tested general skills and thought process
- Was not able to elicit relevant work experience instead went down unrelated rabbit holes
Preguntas de entrevista [1]
Pregunta 1
Explain a certain scenario that you faced which was challenging