1 screening round with hiring manager, 2 rounds of in-person interviews. 2nd round was with the hiring manager's immediate team. Final round was with the broader team, including PMs and a case presentation. Case about how you can creatively market to job seekers. I waited almost 1 month before hearing back from the hiring manager. They chose someone who did better on the case presentation.

1. Phone screen with recruiter 2. 45 minute phone interview with the hiring manager 3. Onsite 4 hour interview with 4-5 people for approx 45 minutes each 4. 2nd onsite interview for about 4 hours + presentation I like LinkedIn as a company and think they have good potential. However, I think their hiring process is a bit too cumbersome. For a company that tries to make it easy for you to display your expertise and potentially get passively recruited by other companies, their hiring process is too time-consuming. I think they can do a better job to be mindful of a professional's time. To have 2 onsite interviews lastly 4 hours each is a big drain on someone's time, in addition to requiring a presentation that can take a candidate 10-20 hours to put together. I really think that's not respectful of a working professional's time to go through multiple of these hoops. I've interviewed at startups (series A small companies, Dropbox, Square, Pinterest) and large companies like Google, Facebook, and I think LinkedIn Head of Recruiting should really internalize and think about how they are setting up their process and whether it's mindful of a working professional. Certainly, the recruiters I've worked with there are professional and friendly, and during your onsite they give you a giftbag and welcome message on the whiteboard, so all those small tokens are nice, but they don't make up for the high hours necessary for a professional to recruit at LinkedIn.