Applied to several positions online. Recruiter reached out within a few days and set up a phone screening. Then spoke with a hiring manager on the phone the following week. For third round, the next week, over three days, I spoke with another manager and a director from the company's Boston HQ on the phone and had two in-person interviews in the Seattle office (one with the same hiring manager and a separate interview with the second-level manager). Received an offer two weeks later. Except for the initial screening, all interviews were "tell me about yourself/background" followed by 3-4 behavioral/STAR questions; pretty standard. The interviewers all had prepared paper templates with the questions and space for their notes on my responses. Overall, the position seemed like a match. However, I wasn't impressed with the offer. I had already disclosed my current compensation and expectations, and they came in below that, which, given my education and experience didn't make a lot of sense to me. I also wasn't impressed with all four interviewers asking similar questions. While I know it's difficult to coordinate different people's schedules (especially across two time zones) it wasn't very considerate of my time to have four separate interviews spanning three days where I essentially answered the same questions repeatedly (including a hiring manager asking me literally the same question in-person as they had on the phone, and me having to re-answer in full..). Other companies I've interviewed with have been able to manage panel interviews, and I think that's a much better way for applicants. To me, that kind of experience hints at them being disorganized. I would have possibly tried negotiating the offer were it not for that somewhat negative perception and interest from another two companies I'd recently applied to.

Behavioral and case study question. Case study is a little awkward, they sat in the room with my while I worked through a math based question. Though they really only cared about my thought process and explanation. Not the answer.