Me postulé a través de un reclutador. El proceso tomó 6 semanas. Acudí a una entrevista en J.P. Morgan (Bengaluru) en may 2014
Entrevista
I was called for the interview on Saturday May 17th 2014.
There was a huge line of people waiting for clearing the security checks. It took almost an hour for me to get the clearance after all the hic ups i went into interview room.
It was directly one on one discussion with the technical panel.
Panel started interviewing me with basic java question to advanced concepts. It was very challenging to clear this round. Later i was said i might have to join with in a month for which i agreed provided they issue me a offer with in a month. I was called again for another round of interview on May 19th 2014 where the same panel asked me some more java questions.
On the same day I was said i have cleared all the technical rounds and will be receiving a offer letter soon.
Its been more than a month now and am still waiting to receive my offer letter. HR keeps telling me they don't have an update from higher management. I really don't understand how can a HR answer so unreasonably.
They are very unprofessional in there response and time lines. My salary discussion happened after 25 days of telling me that i have cleared the technical rounds.
How long do you expect a candidate to wait for you ?
How long does it take to process a candidature ?
If you are not interested in providing a job why do you give false hope to candidates ?
Its actually a case of of IPC 420 cheating and false hope which i can file in court ?
When they said i have been selected i stopped taking calls from other consultancy and gave a stop for my job hunt. Truly frustrating experience and unreasonable responses received from JPMC.
Guys if you are reading this and going to attend an interview with this company, Give it a thought if they can play so hopelessly with a guy outside company what would be your position when you join them.
Attend the interview for experience but do not join them i tell you they screw up your future plans just by the name of interview.
Being a multi billion $ company you should learn how to handle a candidature in the first place.
Preguntas de entrevista [1]
Pregunta 1
What is the difference between -X and -XX arguments ?
How do you write a JNI call when the underlying language used is Perl ?
Me postulé en línea. Acudí a una entrevista en J.P. Morgan
Entrevista
The interview process was well-structured and professional. It started with an online application, followed by an online assessment that included aptitude questions and basic technical/problem-solving tasks. After clearing that, I was invited for 2–3 interview rounds.
The first round focused on technical and role-specific questions along with some questions on past projects and experience. The interviewer also asked about problem-solving approaches and how I handled challenges in previous roles or academic work.
The next round was more behavioral, with questions around teamwork, leadership, and situational scenarios. They were particularly interested in understanding cultural fit and how well I aligned with the company’s values.
Overall, the interviewers were friendly and gave enough time to think through answers. The difficulty level was moderate — not overly tricky but required good preparation and clarity of concepts.Tip:
Be clear on your fundamentals, prepare examples for behavioral questions, and have a good understanding of what JPMorgan Chase does.
Did coding test and pass but after coding round no updates from them.Send mail to them no reply.Still waiting for the update.Once recieve a update from them then I will update here
Me postulé en línea. Acudí a una entrevista en J.P. Morgan en ene 2026
Entrevista
I recently went through a technical interview for a mid-to-senior level engineering role, and the experience was quite disappointing. The interviewer did not provide any introduction or context about the role or the session, and instead immediately jumped into technical questions without setting expectations.
The discussion started with low-level commands and syntax-related questions, but without clarifying the goal or what was being evaluated. When I attempted to explain my reasoning or ask clarifying questions, the responses were minimal and sometimes dismissive, which made the interaction feel one-sided.
There was also a lack of structure in how the questions were asked. Some topics shifted abruptly (for example, from basic command-level questions to conceptual topics like data structures), without a clear flow or objective. This made it difficult to understand what the interviewer was trying to assess.
Overall, the interview did not feel like a constructive technical conversation. It lacked collaboration, clear communication, and professionalism. I would recommend better interviewer training and a more structured and respectful approach to candidate evaluation.