1. Stage one was a coderpad interview with the engineers. It started with some random behavioural questions. Then followed by 2 leetcodes questions, first one is very very basic, just to get you to use to the platform. The second one is a medium leetcode, was not too difficult as well. 2. The second and third interview were scheduled on the same day. The first was also 2 leetcode questions with the team. I think they focused more on the communication at this point. I wasn't quite used to this style of interviewing, I don't think I have done a good job. 1 basic/medium (Linked List) and another medium (Graph). 3. Was genuinely confused by the third round. As I was told that this round was about software engineering. But, was asked to solve leetcode-like questions as well. In hindsight, I think the focus might not be giving the most optimum solution in leetcode sense, but coming up with the class/method/parameters ourselves to solve the given problem. Giving pseudocode was sufficient at this stage. 4. Was given a rejection the day after.