The process itself was well-organised on the surface, and the people I spoke with were professional. But there were inconsistencies throughout that made it difficult to trust the feedback.
Deadlines for decisions were given and then missed without explanation. The scope of the final round changed from what had been communicated earlier. And the stated reason for the outcome felt like a polite way to close the door rather than an honest one.
I came away with the impression that the role’s requirements were not fully defined internally before hiring began, which made it hard to know what was actually being evaluated. For anyone going through their process, I would suggest asking very specific questions about the role’s scope and decision timeline upfront, and not reading too much into positive signals along the way.
