I applied for a position in Little Rock. An H.R. specialist called me to discuss details of the position and confirm my interest. H.R. scheduled a detailed conference call interview with the related team's manager and a project lead. I was also emailed a skills test to complete. The skills test was well devised. This job in particular was for a long term Vis C++ and SQL heavy project. There were questions about rather long bit operation statements, pointer math questions, a bubble-sort algo word problem, and fairly complex SQL query questions in addition to the run-of-the-mill object-oriented bull from most tests. It's the only time a test has ever impressed me. These are things that I expect myself to be able to do to be good at my job. Most potential employers that I've interviewed with have expected much less. My interview with the team manager and project lead went well. There were mostly questions about my experience related to the long term project. There were a few standard questions about problem solving and team work. The interview lasted 45 minutes and was pleasant. I expected, and was told as much, to hear back from them. The next day I had a second phone interview with another company. It also went very well. I reached out to Euronet, but because of bad timing they received my voicemail and email too late. The second company offered me a job the day after my 2nd phone interview. It was quite a bit more than glassdoor.com suggested I'd make at Euronet, so I signed with company 2. I let Euronet know, and I heard back that they were disappointed, but they thanked me for my time. Overall, the interview process at Euronet was wonderful. The test was doable (and should be for every one who would apply), but not your usual test. I would have liked to have heard Euronet's offer if they had one. It would have been interesting to work in a shop that wanted the level of skill and knowledge of it's developers that Euronet obviously wanted.