Me postulé en línea. El proceso tomó 3 semanas. Acudí a una entrevista en Epic en ene 2022
Entrevista
Typical 30 minute phone screen, but the assessment seems overkill. The assessment is proctored and my proctor didn't even show up until 20 minutes later, right before I almost left the session. In terms of the assessment itself, there are 4 sections:
1 - Math and Brain Teaser Round: This round involves 2 minutes of solving math problems and I think a few brain teasers as well. Very difficult to get all of the problems done I'd imagine.
2 - SAT Math - 45-60 minutes of SAT style math questions. I think there were like 13 questions total, but there were also some brain teasers involved.
3 - Learn a new language: Personally I think this section was fine.
4 - Leetcode style problems: You're given 4 problems and are to code in a text editor. No syntax highlighting or running the code is allowed, so you better hope your code runs perfectly.
I would have rated overall experience neutral if the proctor had shown up on time or at least not 20 minutes late. The phone interview was quite positive and I had a good time talking with the software engineer, but the assessment definitely brings down the experience due to its length, difficulty, and unnecessary use of brain teasers.
Preguntas de entrevista [1]
Pregunta 1
Phone interview: Standard questions like experience and why are you interested in Epic.
Assessment: A person buys 1 apple for 5 cents and sells it for 3 cents. After a while, he becomes a millionaire. How does he do this?
Acudí a una entrevista en Epic (San Francisco, CA)
Entrevista
Medium level leetcode and then a very basic system design question as a final round interview. Overall, smooth and simple process. Only one technical and it was the first one.
Preguntas de entrevista [1]
Pregunta 1
How would you design a system to minimize wait time at a health care center?
First round is a thirty minute phone call with one of their developers. The other part of the first round is a three hour exam with IQ test style logic questions and coding questions.
[OA] OA was fair. Programming part are leetcode easy and easy-mediums, straightforward simulation, backtracking, dfs, strings, etc. No DP/graphs but ymmv.
[Final interview] (Case Study) I think the interviewer came up with their own prompt. It's mostly discussion-based, with a virtual white board. It's not too technical. I'm guessing its testing your communication/logical reasoning than system design skills. (Pair programming) 1 question, same format as the OA on the same platform, leetcode easy.
[Overall] Technical difficulty isn't bad. Interviewers who are current software devs seemed friendly. Had a good experience, yet got rejected.