Me postulé a través de una recomendación de un empleado. El proceso tomó 4 semanas. Acudí a una entrevista en Epic en dic 2014
Entrevista
Had an employee refer me, and then they reached out asking for an application. Did a phone interview, which was fairly non-technical (especially considering it's with a developer). I guess the point was to see if you could be articulate
There was an online assessment which was sort of weird to do because you have a proctor watching you through a webcam. It's untimed, but they say they use the time as a factor (mine took somewhere between 2-3 hours). It's really not too bad. A component is programming, which has 4 pretty simple tasks. Another component is a critical thinking section like the GREs. Oh, and I should point out, they say you can use a calculator, and you definitely should. There are some non trivial arithmetic that you might as well have a calculator for. This is, as far as I can tell, where they must get the most information about your technical skills (apart from transcripts and a little bit on site)
Like two weeks later they schedule an on site interview. This was pretty fun. They did a software demo and campus tour. The actual interview part was three parts, two with software people and an hr part. They were really good interviewers from based on my experience with interviews. They didn't do any silly golf ball bus questions.
Preguntas de entrevista [1]
Pregunta 1
They asked me to walk them through a design some software (they gave a scenario).
Acudí a una entrevista en Epic (San Francisco, CA)
Entrevista
Medium level leetcode and then a very basic system design question as a final round interview. Overall, smooth and simple process. Only one technical and it was the first one.
Preguntas de entrevista [1]
Pregunta 1
How would you design a system to minimize wait time at a health care center?
First round is a thirty minute phone call with one of their developers. The other part of the first round is a three hour exam with IQ test style logic questions and coding questions.
[OA] OA was fair. Programming part are leetcode easy and easy-mediums, straightforward simulation, backtracking, dfs, strings, etc. No DP/graphs but ymmv.
[Final interview] (Case Study) I think the interviewer came up with their own prompt. It's mostly discussion-based, with a virtual white board. It's not too technical. I'm guessing its testing your communication/logical reasoning than system design skills. (Pair programming) 1 question, same format as the OA on the same platform, leetcode easy.
[Overall] Technical difficulty isn't bad. Interviewers who are current software devs seemed friendly. Had a good experience, yet got rejected.