You are presented with one live coding challenge that you are expected to pass. Once done you the rest of the interview is talking with the interviewers about your technical experience. You shouldn’t take more than 20 minutes with this challenge.

I was contacted by a recruiter and did a very basic phone screen with him. I then did a phone tech screen with a lead developer. After which I was invited for an on-site interview. The phone screen was nice enough, I enjoyed speaking with the lead developer. It was a fairly basic tech screen plus a logic question (light-bulbs in the other room). The on-site interview was kinda weird. It felt like a cattle call. They only allocated an hour per person and had clearly been doing them all day. When I arrived, they were not ready for me, and when the interview started, they people doing the interview were in and out, buzzing from one meeting or interview to the next. The interviews were also held in what seemed like an un-used office suite, with just a paper sign on the door that had the company name printed on it (when I first arrived, I was a little creeped out by this), and the room I was taken to was completely bare and empty except for a very small table that barely fit the 4 chairs they had pulled up to it. The interview felt very rushed, and I was expected to do more logic problems (the bridge problem and something else that I can't remember) even though the environment was loud and distracting. In general, I enjoyed speaking with the technical people, though, I had concerns about their approach to code maintainability and collaboration. The interview really made me appreciate where I currently am, to be honest.