Reviewing my recent experience interviewing at Medlab has left me with a sense of disappointment and concern. From the beginning, the recruitment process felt somewhat sketchy, and I'd like to share my experience to help others considering opportunities with this organization. The initial contact from the recruiter seemed promising, and I was eager to learn more about the position. However, when I asked about certain aspects of the role, the recruiter was evasive, refusing to disclose any information, claiming it was too early in the process. This lack of transparency raised some red flags, but I decided to proceed with the interviews, hoping for a better impression. The first interview with a senior representative over Zoom was surprisingly positive. We connected well, and I felt confident that my background aligned perfectly with their requirements. However, during this interview, I discovered that all sales at the company were expected to be conducted exclusively through in-person visits. Any inquiries about relationship building through phone communication were quickly dismissed. This rigid approach to sales struck me as outdated and inflexible, considering the advancements in remote communication. Despite my concerns, I was invited for an in-person interview with a team of account executives who had been with the company for several years. While I appreciated meeting the team and getting a sense of the company's culture, it became apparent that the format of the interview was excessive and unnecessarily prolonged. Multiple rounds of interviews were conducted, and it seemed like the company was genuinely interested in moving forward with my candidacy. However, my hope was short-lived when the final interview with a senior executive took place over Zoom. The conversation felt lackluster, and the executive appeared distracted throughout the discussion, asking standard questions without delving deeper into my qualifications or experiences. Dishearteningly, I received a rejection email the following week, citing a "lack of experience" as the reason for not moving forward with my application. This rejection left me puzzled and frustrated. If my experience was genuinely the issue, why put me through several rounds of interviews, raising my hopes with positive feedback along the way? Overall, my experience with this healthcare company has left me with a bad feeling about their recruitment and hiring practices. I am disappointed not to have received an offer from them, as I cannot imagine working for an organization that lacks transparency, utilizes outdated sales methods, and treats candidates with disregard. I hope my candid feedback helps others considering opportunities with this healthcare company to approach the process with caution and diligence. Transparency and respect are essential in any recruitment process, and unfortunately, this company fell short in providing both.

Multi-stage interview process consisting of initial screening, direct supervisor, senior sales leader and VP of Sales. A lot of talking to rather than being questioned until call with VP. This was the first time I answered questions about my background, goals and value I could bring to the company. Company completely ghosted on me following call with VP. Job was posted again 2 weeks after my interview rounds were completed.