The process began with a conversation with their recruiter, which I found to be insightful and productive. It set a positive tone for the subsequent stages of the interview process. Next, I engaged in a technical interview with two of their engineers. We delved into discussing my approach to troubleshooting scenarios, providing a platform for a meaningful exchange of ideas and insights. I received a feedback that I aced this part of the interview. It was followed by a live coding challenge which posed an opportunity to showcase my technical prowess under pressure. However, there were time constraints, with only around 15-20 minutes remaining to solve the challenge. Complicating matters was the demand to explain my thought process, consuming valuable time. Despite the challenge, I remained focused and managed to devise a solution within the allotted timeframe. Despite successfully completing the coding challenge, I was disheartened to learn during the feedback call that my solution was deemed insufficiently clean. This outcome came as a surprise and disappointment, given my efforts to address the challenge comprehensively within the constraints provided. Reflecting on my experience, while I appreciate the transparency and clarity of the interview process, the discrepancy between the expectations and evaluation criteria for the coding challenge leaves room for improvement. As a candidate committed to continuous growth and excellence, I trust that Catawiki will consider refining their assessment criteria to ensure alignment with candidates' demonstrated capabilities and efforts.

Interview was long and communication was poor. The entire interview process was around two months. There were five interviews. Two HR-style interview, two tech interviews and one HR-style interview with the owner.