Several phone interviews with finance leaders. One HR prep interview. On site interview with 6 people. Two HR, one Ops, 3 finance leaders (not the ones from the phone interviews). The on site was the most intense, but the material helped to prep you - you need personal examples to align with their leadership principles. Most people were very nice, but as others have stated there is one person who acts in a mildly derogatory manner and insinuates that you don't know what you are talking about. I believe that is to determine how you react to someone pushing back. Stay cool and realize its a game. There is a basic excel test you take prior to the scheduling of your on site. They do a nice job of setting up your travel and provide a decent hotel, near to the site. Although I had the experience and education that they were looking for - I had to repeatedly reach out to people for 3 weeks after the on site, asking for some resolution. The HR person said she had left me a VM (which she did not) and I finally got someone to tell me they weren't going to move forward with my candidacy. In retrospect, I believe that it may be a case of age discrimination. Everyone I interviewed with was at least 10-15 years younger than I was. I have also spoken to another individual (around my age) who had the same experience and despite being very qualified - was abruptly dropped from the process after the on site. I never misrepresented myself, my experience and my social networking picture is current. Although I have no definitive proof - I would tell people over 50 to serious think about investing their time to prepare and travel to interview with a very company that values youth. Other than the time I felt that I wasted, the overall experience was not negative until after the on-site and only because I couldn't get a definite answer and that was only one silly HR person. That's why I rated it as neutral.