Great people - Evaluación del empleado para Empleado anónimo en New Mexico Environment Department

5.0
24 nov 2024
Empleado anónimo
Recomendada
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Great coworkers, great place to work

Desventajas

No work from home options anymore

Echa un vistazo a otras evaluaciones sobre New Mexico Environment Department.

5.0
17 feb 2024
Recomendada
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Very intelligent and collaborative team

Desventajas

Having to have teams on all day long when I did not need to use it majority of the time

1.0
21 may 2026
Recomendada
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

• Meaningful mission — The environmental work is important, and many staff are passionate and dedicated. • Talented colleagues — There are knowledgeable, committed people across the agency who genuinely care about public health and environmental protection. • Opportunities to learn — If you’re self‑directed, you can gain strong regulatory, technical, and program‑management experience. • Flexible work options — Depending on the bureau, telework and flexible schedules are available (but only after you’ve served a one year probation)

Desventajas

• HR controls hiring and salary — Hiring managers do not determine salary. HR sets the offer, controls the variance process, and can deny a hiring manager’s request without explanation. • Salary depends on résumé formatting, not experience — People with less or no environmental experience can be hired at higher salaries simply because they submitted a fully detailed résumé with MM‑DD‑YYYY dates for every job. If you didn’t know this rule when you applied, HR will lock you into a lower salary and will not correct it later. • Slow, inconsistent hiring process — Variances can be denied late in the process, forcing positions to be reposted and candidates to re‑interview. Timelines can stretch for months to over a year. • Leadership inconsistency — Some managers are excellent, but others rely on performative oversight, unnecessary double‑checking, and inconsistent communication. Staff can feel second‑guessed rather than supported. • Internal communication gaps — Decisions affecting workloads, hiring, or timelines are often communicated late or not at all. • Bureaucratic culture — Processes can feel more focused on optics and control than on efficiency or trust. • Emotional fatigue from inconsistent leadership — Staff may experience frustration when accuracy and initiative are met with unnecessary scrutiny.

Ver evaluaciones por: Útil|Calificación|Fecha|Todo