Sinking ship - Evaluación del empleado para Project Engineer Leader en Dow

1.0
10 mar 2026
Recomendada
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

best place for lazy, workshy incompetent people. Best company to promote nonperformance and preserve incompetence.

Desventajas

Career spoiling organisation. Only sycophants can become leaders here. Leaders are highly competent in giving benefits to themselves. They got office shifted near their home at the huge expense to company. Leaders ar highly selfish, work for their goals even if it brings loss to company. First they hire more people than required to get promoted as leader and then during restructuring remove extra employees to save their job. Leaders cannot work with competent people so they don't hire them. They only hire Tamils. Proof is that 95% of leaders in CEC are Tamils and they only promote Tamils. One can see lot of positive reviews saying "great place", "great place to work", "Inclusive and diverse", etc. etc.. Don't fall for these fancy key words, those are forced feedback by leaders to create a positive image on online platforms. They are masters of getting all sort of external agency certificates like "best workplace for women" etc. Reality is that this is the worst place to work.

Echa un vistazo a otras evaluaciones sobre Dow.

5.0
16 abr 2026
Recomendada
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Culture and the technical expertise within the company provide for a working environment where you don't work in silo and everyone is willing to help support you

Desventajas

Administrative systems can be burdensome to overcome.

2.0
22 mar 2026
Recomendada
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Safety culture, flexibility (although less and less over time). Good health insurance and 401k match

Desventajas

Dow’s recent years illustrate the challenges of trying to simultaneously satisfy Wall Street’s demands for strong financial performance and aggressive DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) priorities. The company has heavily emphasized inclusion initiatives, including its openly gay CEO publicly sharing that coming out was one of the best days of his life in an internal communication, along with a notable increase in women appointed to senior leadership roles. Hiring practices reportedly require diverse candidate slates—including female candidates—and diverse interview panels before filling positions. These efforts, while well-intentioned, appear to have contributed to a series of questionable strategic decisions. Employees have borne the brunt through repeated rounds of layoffs (including significant cuts announced in recent years), minimal merit increases often in the 2-3% range, stalled promotions, and little turnover at the top levels of leadership. Senior executives seem insulated from the consequences, potentially overlooking how these factors—including their own leadership—may be central to the company’s ongoing struggles.

1
Ver evaluaciones por: Útil|Calificación|Fecha|Todo