Ir al contenidoIr al pie de página
  • Empleos
  • Empresas
  • Sueldos
  • Para empleadores

      Impulsa tu carrera profesional

      Averigua cuánto podrías ganar, encuentra el empleo perfecto y comparte información sobre tu vida laboral y personal de forma anónima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      GitHub

      ¿Esta es tu empresa?

      Información
      Evaluaciones
      Pago y prestaciones
      Empleos
      Entrevistas
      Entrevistas
      Búsquedas relacionadas: Evaluaciones de GitHub | Empleos en GitHub | Sueldos en GitHub | Prestaciones en GitHub
      Entrevistas en GitHubEntrevistas para el cargo de Software Engineer en GitHubEntrevista en GitHub


      Glassdoor

      • Acerca de
      • Premios
      • Blog
      • Contacto

      Empleadores

      • Cuenta de empleador gratuita
      • Centro de empleador

      Información

      • Ayuda
      • Pautas
      • Condiciones de uso
      • Privacidad y opciones de anuncios
      • No vender ni compartir mi información
      • Herramienta de autorización de cookies

      Trabaja con nosotros

      • Anunciantes
      • Oportunidades laborales
      Descargar aplicación

      • Buscar por:
      • Empresas
      • Empleos
      • Ubicaciones

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor", "Worklife Pro", "Bowls" y sus logotipos son marcas comerciales registradas de Glassdoor LLC.

      Empresas seguidas

      Sigue a tus empresas favoritas para estar al tanto de las últimas oportunidades y disponer de información desde adentro.

      Búsquedas de empleo

      Recibe recomendaciones y actualizaciones personalizadas al iniciar tu búsqueda.

      Entrevista para Software Engineer

      21 ago 2017
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Oakland, CA
      Sin ofertas
      Experiencia negativa
      Entrevista promedio

      Solicitud

      Me postulé a través de un reclutador. El proceso tomó 2 semanas. Acudí a una entrevista en GitHub (Oakland, CA) en ago 2017

      Entrevista

      After a video chat with the hiring manager, I scheduled a time to do an online test for GitHub. In a separate email, I was informed that the test would involve writing a simple NodeJS AddOn, and that the particular task didn't require specialized domain knowledge, beyond knowing C++. The email informed me that the code for the test was developed against a specific version of NodeJS, which was older than the available current version, and that I would be sent a link to GitHub repo, which would be accessible for a limited time. Finally, the email said there were would be a README file that contained specific instructions for setting up the development environment. On the day of the test, I received an automated email that contained a link to the GitHub repository, as promised. I cloned the repository onto my laptop. There was a README file that contained a description of the problem I was supposed to solve and the file contained information about how to run the unit tests to exercise the project that I was supposed to modify, but there were no instructions on setting up the environment to run the project. I spent a significant amount of time and effort just setting up the development environment, as I had to scour the GitHub forums to resolve my issues. I only have a passing familiarity with NodeJS and had never written a NodeJS AddOn, which I admitted readily to the hiring manager, but it was really unfair to have to struggle with development environment set-up issues in addition to having to work with a new technology on a time limited test. That stress over the development environment was completely unnecessary. On top of that, one of the unit test scripts contained an output formatting error. This bug in the test script resulted in the failure of the unit tests because the output lines it produced did not contain carriage returns, even though the output lines produced by the test from the solution logically matched the output lines of the file containing expected output. Given that the expectation that the unit tests were supposed to be a black box, it was unclear whether the bug in the test script was an intentional bug I was expected to fix. Dealing with these set up problems and debugging the unit test script issues ate up a good chunk of the time I was given to access the test repository, and although I solved the problem itself, I was not able to make a clean submission for my test. In conclusion, this test had one of the shoddiest set-ups I have ever experienced. Coding tests should be fun, and while I learned a new technology (NodeJS AddOns are cool!), the stress from the set-up problems with which I had to deal - problems that could have been solved with better instructions - did not make this test fun.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      Write a NodeJS Addon, and make sure it passes all the provided unit tests.
      1 respuesta
      13
      avatar
      Respuesta de GitHub
      8y
      We really appreciate you leaving this detailed feedback and after reading it, we have made some changes to the technical exercise based on your experience with us. We are revamping the preparation email to include more detailed instructions and hope to continue to improve the quality of this exercise moving forward. Thank you again for sharing this.

      Otras evaluaciones sobre las entrevistas para el cargo de Software Engineer en GitHub

      Entrevista para Software Engineer

      21 may 2026
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Sin ofertas
      Experiencia negativa
      Entrevista promedio

      Solicitud

      Acudí a una entrevista en GitHub

      Entrevista

      There were a total of four interview rounds: a recruiter screening, a hiring manager interview, and a loop consisting of system design and coding rounds. The interviews went very well, and after each round, the interviewers seemed highly impressed and mentioned that I would hear back from the recruiter soon. However, I was ultimately rejected because the decision came down to a very close comparison between me and another candidate. Additionally, the recruiter was not very helpful throughout the process, which made the experience more frustrating.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      Behavioral questions and previous work experience
      Responder pregunta

      Entrevista para Software Engineer

      5 feb 2026
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      New York, NY
      Sin ofertas
      Experiencia neutra
      Entrevista promedio

      Solicitud

      Acudí a una entrevista en GitHub (New York, NY)

      Entrevista

      Gave OA after passing the interview screening. Recruiter will reach out it was only 1 problem in the OA on hackerrank to solve and recruiter will reach out immediately after that’s been solved

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      One leetcode recursive problem for Oa
      Responder pregunta

      Entrevista para Software Engineer

      23 mar 2026
      Empleado anónimo
      Oferta aceptada
      Experiencia positiva
      Entrevista fácil

      Solicitud

      Me postulé en línea. Acudí a una entrevista en GitHub en feb 2025

      Entrevista

      Interviewed for SWII. Was straightforward. Had a talk with a recruiter and asked basic behavior questions then told me on the call that I am being pushed to interview day. I was given what the questions might be, Interview day was 2 technical interviews and one cultural. Technical questions was to build a game of battlefield and the other was the set up some HTTP calls.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      A game of battlefield. Set up HTTP calls
      Responder pregunta

      Las mejores empresas en cuanto a "Remuneración y prestaciones" cerca de ti

      avatar
      Amazon
      3.7★Remuneración y prestaciones
      avatar
      Maze
      4.5★Remuneración y prestaciones