Ir al contenidoIr al pie de página
  • Empleos
  • Empresas
  • Sueldos
  • Para empleadores

      Impulsa tu carrera profesional

      Averigua cuánto podrías ganar, encuentra el empleo perfecto y comparte información sobre tu vida laboral y personal de forma anónima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Elliptic

      Empleador activo

      Información
      Evaluaciones
      Pago y prestaciones
      Empleos
      Entrevistas
      Entrevistas
      Búsquedas relacionadas: Evaluaciones de Elliptic | Empleos en Elliptic | Sueldos en Elliptic | Prestaciones en Elliptic
      Entrevistas en EllipticEntrevistas para el cargo de Senior Full Stack Engineer en EllipticEntrevista en Elliptic


      Glassdoor

      • Acerca de
      • Premios
      • Blog
      • Contacto

      Empleadores

      • Cuenta de empleador gratuita
      • Centro de empleador

      Información

      • Ayuda
      • Pautas
      • Condiciones de uso
      • Privacidad y opciones de anuncios
      • No vender ni compartir mi información
      • Herramienta de autorización de cookies

      Trabaja con nosotros

      • Anunciantes
      • Oportunidades laborales
      Descargar aplicación

      • Buscar por:
      • Empresas
      • Empleos
      • Ubicaciones

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor", "Worklife Pro", "Bowls" y sus logotipos son marcas comerciales registradas de Glassdoor LLC.

      Empresas seguidas

      Sigue a tus empresas favoritas para estar al tanto de las últimas oportunidades y disponer de información desde adentro.

      Búsquedas de empleo

      Recibe recomendaciones y actualizaciones personalizadas al iniciar tu búsqueda.

      Las mejores empresas en cuanto a "Remuneración y prestaciones" cerca de ti

      avatar
      Amazon
      3.7★Remuneración y prestaciones
      avatar
      KPMG
      3.6★Remuneración y prestaciones
      avatar
      Telefónica
      3.8★Remuneración y prestaciones
      avatar
      Toyota Motor Corporation
      3.9★Remuneración y prestaciones

      Entrevista para Senior Full Stack Engineer

      25 mar 2022
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Sin ofertas
      Experiencia negativa
      Entrevista difícil

      Solicitud

      Me postulé a través de un reclutador. Acudí a una entrevista en Elliptic en mar 2022

      Entrevista

      The first process was a normal round of introductions. The second was a technical test. A timed box code challenge to delivery in just one hour. The first problem is that the company asked for typescript and then you are faced with a test in vanilla JS. The second issue is the complexity of the problem, it was too big to solve in just one hour, and in the instructions, they inform that they were realistic so they don't expect the user to finish it. I will say, if you know that is not achievable in one hour, give more time, or reduce the scope of the problem, but don't make a code challenge more stressful for a candidate than normally it is already is. Third problem: Code feedback. Well, there was almost none. The recruiter called me back, and say they didn't like my code. I have interviewed multiple candidates in different companies and after a code challenge, we have another meeting to discuss the proposed solution. One of the best engineers I have worked with had "failed" in this coding exercise. But after the session, we discussed his approach, ask how we would change his code giving different scenarios and we were impressed by his answers .

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      Timebox code challenge in code plataform .
      Responder pregunta
      avatar
      Respuesta de Elliptic
      4y
      Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback and I apologize that you had a bad experience interviewing with us. We are constantly iterating this process, and your feedback is valuable and will provide a better experience for future candidates. To your specific points: - Typescript vs Vanilla JS - We don’t ask specifically for Typescript from applicants. If someone has no Typescript experience this isn’t a blocker for us. If we had the test in Typescript rather than Vanilla, we’d be excluding more candidates. That being said, given the exercise is more about interpreting business requirements than advanced language specific coding, we have considered opening this up to a scripting language of the candidate’s choosing, and will review this again in light of your comments. - Time available to do the exercise - This is something we feel very strongly about. The purpose is to protect your time. We have all done tech tests which say they should “take an hour” but end up taking five! As you rightly say, we go out of our way to state that many candidates do not finish the exercise and that is not a blocker to progression. This is to try to alleviate pressure. Additionally, an important aspect of this exercise is to understand how candidates make decisions about where to spend a limited amount of time to deliver the highest impact and biggest value. - Candidates not progressing to the next stage - candidates don't tend to do well in the subsequent exercises if they fail to reach a particular bar here. We want to be respectful of everyone’s time and end a process when we have enough information to make a decision about a potential match. - Code feedback - When I read your review I was shocked to see that you had not been provided with feedback on your code. This is absolutely the least we can do after you have spent the hour completing the exercise, and we’ve fallen short here. I’ll be following up internally to try to understand how this happened, and ensure it doesn’t happen again. If you would like a session to cover off the feedback, please reach out to stephen@elliptic.co.